Cases 61 - 70 of 248
Moore v. Shinn et al
as 3:2020cv08137
Defendant:
Unknown Cole, Unknown Levangood, Unknown Johnston and others
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Aaron Moore
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nordstrom v. Shinn et al
as 4:2020cv00248
Respondent:
David Shinn, Jeff Van Winkle and Stephen Morris
Petitioner:
Scott Douglas Nordstrom
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Gomez #342507 v. Morris et al
as 2:2020cv00823
Respondent:
Stephen Morris and Attorney General of the State of Arizona
Petitioner:
Jesus Alonso Gomez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Pember #067165 v. Shinn et al
as 2:2020cv00625
Defendant:
M Smith, Stephen Morris, Unknown Rowley and others
Plaintiff:
Jay Lynn Pember
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Clark #283330 v. Unknown Party
as 2:2020cv00591
Respondent:
Unknown Party, Arizona, State of and Steve Morris
Petitioner:
Kyle L Clark
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Adams #253141 v. Arizona, State of et al
as 2:2020cv00581
Defendant:
Arizona, State of, Mark Brnovich, Stephen Morris and others
Plaintiff:
Andre Adams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Martinez v. Shinn et al
as 2:2020cv00517
Respondent:
David Shinn, Jeff Van Winkle and Stephen Morris
Petitioner:
Gilbert Martinez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Alsaud v. Carr et al
as 2:2020cv00449
Defendant:
Rodney Carr, Unknown Young, Unknown Ochoa and others
Plaintiff:
Shaykh Muhammad Abdul Aziz Khalid Bin Talal Alsaud
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Moore v. Struck, Love, Bojanowski & Acedo PLC et al
as 3:2020cv08043
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey A Moore
Defendant:
Struck, Love, Bojanowski & Acedo PLC, Blair Hartwell Moses, Arizona Department of Corrections and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Moore v. GEO Group Incorporated et al
as 3:2020cv08038
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey A Moore
Defendant:
Unknown Morris, Unknown Flemming, Unknown Coday and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
