Cases 1 - 10 of 95
SCOTT v. JEFFRIES et al
as 5:2026cv00268
Plaintiff:
DENNIS DEMETRIUS SCOTT
Defendant:
WARDEN JEFFRIES, DEPUTY WARDEN DESIREE JAMES, BRITTANY LATOUR and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2026cv61508
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Jinks v. Maddox et al
as 1:2026cv01593
Plaintiff:
Eddie Lee Jinks
Defendant:
Sheriff Melody Maddox, Maintenance, Calvin Tillman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
David Meyers v. D. Nelson
as 26-6322
Plaintiff:
DAVID MEYERS
Defendant:
OFFICER MR. D. NELSON, MR. DAVIS, SERGEANT MR. FILIMORE and others
David Meyers v. Mr. Mullens
as 26-6231
Plaintiff:
DAVID MEYERS
Defendant:
INTEL OFFICER LIEUTENANT MR. MULLENS, Red Onion State Prison, ROSP MAIL STAFF, SERGEANT T. DEEL, ROSP and others
Meyers v. Mullens et al
as 7:2026cv00010
Plaintiff:
David Meyers
Defendant:
Intel Officer Lt. Mr. Mullens, ROSP Mail Staff, Sgt. T. Deel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Meyers v. Nelson et al
as 7:2025cv00739
Plaintiff:
David Meyers
Defendant:
Officer Mr. D. Nelson, Officer Mr. Davis, Sergeant Mr. Filimore and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Orr v. Davis et al.
as 4:2025cv01335
Plaintiff:
Darllel Orr
Defendant:
Cynthia Davis, Mr. Davis and Mr. Aderholt
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Crummie v. Murdoc et al
as 2:2025cv06118
Plaintiff:
Curtis S. Crummie
Defendant:
Captain-Lt Murdoc, Sgt Mr. Williams, C.O. Miss R. Caraway and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Qian Williams v. Edgefield Mail Room Clerks
as 25-6297
Plaintiff:
QIAN WILLIAMS
Defendant:
EDGEFIELD FEDERAL CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION, JOHN DOES, MR. PARKER and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
