Cases 31 - 40 of 218
MTGLQ Investors v. Wellington
as 22-2070
Plaintiff / Appellee:
MTGLQ INVESTORS, LP
Defendant / Appellant:
MONICA WELLINGTON
Papapietro v. Clott et al
as 1:2022cv03409
Plaintiff:
Anthony Papapietro
Defendant:
Michael Howard Clott, Bjorn Koritz, John Murray and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Hammons v. Selene Finance LP. et al
as 3:2022cv00678
Plaintiff:
Kevin Hammons
Defendant:
MTGLQ Investors, L.P. and Selene Finance LP.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Pugh v. MTGLQ Investors LP et al
as 4:2022cv01070
Plaintiff:
Maxine Felder Pugh
Defendant:
MTGLQ Investors LP, Mortgage Contracting Services LLC, Cyprexx Services LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Personal Injury
Rodriguez v. Selene Finance LP et al
as 4:2022cv00137
Plaintiff:
Samuel Rodriguez
Defendant:
Selene Finance LP, MTGLQ Investors LP and Unknown Parties
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Breach of Contract
Papapietro v. Clott et al
as 1:2022cv01318
Plaintiff:
Anthony Papapietro
Defendant:
Michael Howard Clott, Bjorn Koritz, John Murray and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Wellington v. MTGLQ Investors, LP et al
as 1:2022cv00069
Plaintiff:
David Wellington
Defendant:
MTGLQ Investors, LP and Margaret Lake
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv14487
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv14486
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Maxwell v. NewRez LLC, et al
as 21-1910
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KEITH JASON MAXWELL
Defendant / Appellee:
NEWREZ, LLC, a/k/a New Penn Financial, LLC, d/b/a Shellpoint Mortgage Servicing, MTGLQ INVESTORS, L.P., GOLDMAN SACHS GROUP, INC., and all subsidiaries and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
