Cases 1 - 10 of 233
Henderson v. Mike Dewine et al
as 2:2024cv02006
Interested Party:
State of Ohio
Plaintiff:
Antonio Henderson
Defendant:
Mike Dewine, Amy Acton, Annette Chambers-Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Murphy v. Washington et al
as 2:2024cv10945
Plaintiff:
Timothy Murphy
Defendant:
Heidi Washington, Jong Choi, Rickey Coleman and others
Johnson v. Whited et al
as 5:2024cv00094
Plaintiff:
Ryan Johnson
Defendant:
Chris Whited, Lane Irwin, David Stambaugh and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Whited et al
as 3:2024cv00210
Plaintiff:
Ryan Johnson
Defendant:
Chris Whited, Lane Irwin, David Stambaugh and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jason Tyrrell, et al v. Richard Robinson, et al
as 24-1266
Plaintiff:
JASON ALAN TYRRELL and ALVIN DWAYNE FRAZIER
Defendant:
RICHARD LEE ROBINSON, WILLIAM CHARLES VALKEMA, CRESTON JEROME HICKS and others
Murphy v. Washington et al
as 2:2024cv10735
Plaintiff:
Timothy Murphy
Defendant:
Heidi Washington, Jong Choi, Rickey Coleman and others
Patrick Carmody v. TDOC, et al
as 24-5243
Plaintiff:
PATRICK S. CARMODY
Defendant:
TDOC, FRANK STRADA, Commissioner, in his individual and official capacities, LEE DOTSON, Asst. Commissioner, in his official and individual capacities and others
Pouncy v. Federspiel et al
as 2:2024cv10554
Plaintiff:
Omar Rashad Pouncy
Defendant:
William L. Federspiel, Miguel Gomez, Ebony Rasco and others
Hollis v. Holloway et al
as 3:2024cv00178
Plaintiff:
Horace Hollis
Defendant:
James M. Holloway, Eugene Lewis, Cpl. f/n/u White and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Murphy #769317 v. Michigan Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2024cv00006
Plaintiff:
Anthony Murphy #769317
Defendant:
Michigan Department of Corrections, Heidi E. Washington, Unknown Hoffman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
