Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Murray Law Firm et al v. Phipps Anderson Deacon, L.L.P. et al
as 2:2016cv03675
Plaintiff:
Murray Law Firm and Stephen B. Murray, Sr.
Defendant:
Phipps Anderson Deacon, L.L.P., Martin Phipps P.L.L.C. and Martin J. Phipps
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Harden v. Murray Law Firm, LLC et al
as 4:2015cv00870
Plaintiff:
Donald G. Harden
Defendant:
Murray Law Firm, LLC, Pulaski and Middleman Law Firm, LLC, Robin Meyers Primeau and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Don Downing, et al v. Goldman Phipps, et al
as 13-2345
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Don M. Downing and Adam J. Levitt, on behalf of themselves and those similarly situated
Defendant - Appellee:
Goldman Phipps, PLLC, Goldman, Pennebaker & Phipps, P.C., Martin Phipps and others
Don Downing, et al v. Goldman Phipps, et al
as 13-1805
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Don M. Downing and Adam J. Levitt, on behalf of themselves and those similarly situated
Defendant - Appellant:
Goldman Phipps, PLLC, Goldman, Pennebaker & Phipps, P.C., Martin Phipps and others
Goldman Phipps PLLC et al v. Gray, Ritter & Graham, P.C. et al
as 2:2013cv00049
Plaintiff:
Goldman Phipps PLLC , Mikal C. Watts, P.C. and Murray Law Firm
Defendant:
Gray, Ritter & Graham, P.C., Wolf Haldenstein Adler Freeman & Herz LLC, Seeger Weiss LLP and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal
Downing et al v. Goldman Phipps PLLC et al
as 4:2013cv00206
Defendant:
Goldman Phipps PLLC , Goldman, Pennebaker & Phipps P.C. , Martin Phipps and others
Plaintiff:
Don M. Downing and Adam J. Levitt
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1335 Interpleader Action
In Re: High Sulfur Content, et al
as 09-30313
Appellant:
DANIEL E BECNEL, JR.
Appellee:
FRANK A SILVESTRI, JOHN P MASSICOT, SILVESTRI & MASSICOT and others
In Re: High Sulfur, et al
as 07-30384
Appellant:
FRANK A SILVESTRI, JOHN P MASSICOT, SILVESTRI & MASSICOT and others
Appellee:
WALTER CLAYTON DUMAS, PATRICK E GERAGHTY, RICHARD J ARSENAULT and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
