Cases 1 - 10 of 148
Sweatte v. Myers
as 8:2024cv00126
Petitioner:
Tori Sweatte
Respondent:
Micheal Myers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Merlin Williams v. State of Mississippi, et al
as 23-2676
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Merlin Lkent Williams
Defendant / Appellee:
State of Mississippi, Muriel B. Ellis, Jim M. Greenlee and others
Myers v. USA
as 4:2023cv00481
Petitioner:
Anthony Eugene Myers
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Myers v. Core Civic of America
as 4:2023cv00454
Plaintiff:
Anthony Eugene Myers
Defendant:
Core Civic of America and Leavenworth Detention Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cox v. Douglas County Department of Corrections et al
as 8:2023cv00239
Plaintiff:
Travis Cox
Defendant:
Douglas County Department of Corrections, Wellpath and Mike Myers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Finley v. Myers
as 8:2023cv00224
Petitioner:
Troy R. Finley
Respondent:
Micheal Myers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Cox v. Board of Parole et al
as 8:2023cv00202
Plaintiff:
Travis Cox
Defendant:
Board of Parole, Office of Parole Supervision, Office of Parole Administration and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. State of Mississippi et al
as 0:2023cv00086
Plaintiff:
Merlin Lkent Williams
Defendant:
State of Mississippi, Muriel B. Ellis, Jim M. GreenLee and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Myers v. Payne
as 4:2022cv01205
Plaintiff:
Randy Myers
Defendant:
Dexter Payne
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Wood v. Douglas County Jail et al
as 8:2022cv00397
Plaintiff:
Joseph D. Wood
Defendant:
Douglas County Jail, Michael Myers, Vega and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
