Cases 1 - 10 of 2,129
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2025cv00158
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Lawrence Crawford, et al v. Multi-District Litigation Panel of Ohio, et al
as 25-3016
Plaintiff:
LAWRENCE L. CRAWFORD, aka Jonah Gabriel Jahjah Tishbite and JEREMIAH MACKEY, JR.
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, CITY OF WHITEHALL, OH and MULTI-DISTRICT LITIGATION PANEL OF OHIO
McKenzie v. COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 2:2025cv00031
Defendant:
LATRICE JARVIS and Kimberly Ann Mackey
Plaintiff:
Timothy McKenzie
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
USA v. Anthony Mackey
as 25-10021
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
ANTHONY TYRONE MACKEY
Furman v. Mackey
as 1:2024cv01925
Petitioner:
John Furman
Respondent:
Warden Misty Mackey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Mackey v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration et al
as 5:2025cv00001
Plaintiff:
Bethany Alantis Mackey
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Dynza Mackey v. Attorney General United States of America
as 24-3377
Petitioner:
DYNZA CORNELIUS MACKEY
Respondent:
ATTORNEY GENERAL UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv04306
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv05045
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Mackey v. Bath and Body Works Brand Management Inc
as 4:2024cv01742
Plaintiff:
Judy Mackey
Defendant:
Bath and Body Works Brand Management Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
