Cases 1 - 10 of 35
Kayla Heidelberg v. City of Peoria, Illinois, et al
as 24-1706
Plaintiff:
KAYLA HEIDELBERG, Administrator of the Estate of Cleve Heidelberg, Jr.
Defendant:
CITY OF PEORIA, ILLINOIS, LARRY BERNARD, EMANUEL MANIAS and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00959
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Martinez v. Zahtz et al
as 3:2023cv50052
Plaintiff:
Manuel Martinez
Defendant:
Dr. Merrill Zahtz, Macklin, Lahman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv05361
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Macklin v. City Of Rockford et al
as 3:2022cv50342
Plaintiff:
Renard D. Macklin
Defendant:
City Of Rockford, Dan Oshea, New Towne Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MACKLIN v. COOK INCORPORATED et al
as 1:2021cv00872
Defendant:
COOK INCORPORATED, COOK MEDICAL LLC and WILLIAM COOK EUROPE APS
Plaintiff:
JACQUELINE MACKLIN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BROWN v. USA
as 1:2020cv00476
Petitioner:
MACKLIN BROWN
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Little et al v. Dufour Yachts SAS et al
as 1:2019cv05411
Defendant:
Eric Macklin, Dufour Yachts USA, Inc., Jeffrey Eric Macklin and others
Plaintiff:
Little Limits LLC, Matthew Little and Sherry Little
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Heidelberg v. Hibser et al
as 1:2018cv01161
Plaintiff:
Stephen Heidelberg
Defendant:
Paul Hibser, Nolan Macklin, Kenneth Decremer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Macklin v. Biomet Inc et al
as 3:2014cv01787
Plaintiff:
Ola Macklin
Defendant:
Biomet Inc , Biomet Orthopedics LLC , Biomet US Reconstruction LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
