Cases 11 - 20 of 134
BERRY v. CARTER et al
as 2:2022cv00342
Plaintiff:
SIDNEY A. BERRY, II
Defendant:
ROBERT E. CARTER, JR., DUSHAN ZATECKY, HUGHETT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dobbs v. Gonzales et al
as 3:2022cv50258
Plaintiff:
John C. Dobbs
Defendant:
Gonzales, J. Leonowicz, Stuer and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Kincaid v. Fulton et al
as 3:2022cv50252
Plaintiff:
Christopher A. Kincaid
Defendant:
D. Fulton, C. Cook, Lt. John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv00709
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Clayborne et al v. TRITI et al
as 2:2022cv00694
Plaintiff:
Jack A Clayborne, Robert D Cartledge, Justin L Williams and others
Defendant:
TRITI, MPJMJ, CNMCM and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MADDEN v. REAGLE
as 1:2022cv00724
Petitioner:
DARREN MADDEN
Respondent:
DENNIS REAGLE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Gail Stockton v. Milwaukee County, Wisconsin, et al
as 22-1116
Plaintiff / Appellant:
GAIL STOCKTON, individually and as Special Administrator of the ESTATE OF MICHAEL MADDEN, deceased
Defendant / Appellee:
MILWAUKEE COUNTY, WISCONSIN, DAVID A. CLARKE, JR., RICHARD SCHMIDT and others
Clervrain, Manetirony et al v. Farrow, Paul et al
as 3:2021cv00819
Plaintiff:
Manetirony Clervrain and Francis Cobbina Osei-Fosu
Defendant:
Paul Farrow, Gerard Randall, Jesse Garza and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv05543
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
GRIFFIN v. KNIESER, et al
as 1:2021cv02206
Plaintiff:
VIRGIL GRIFFIN
Defendant:
MARTIAL KNIESER and TIEA MADDEN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
