Cases 1 - 10 of 22
Bradley v. Allen et al
as 4:2023cv00180
Plaintiff:
Dana Ruby Bradley
Defendant:
Wes Allen, Nancy Dahlstrom, Adrian Fontes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
Burchfield v. Alibaba Group Holding Limited et al
as 4:2022cv00861
Plaintiff:
Bradley C Burchfield
Defendant:
Alibaba Group Holding Limited, Alibaba.com Inc, Jack Yun Ma and others
3Rd Party Defendant:
Timothy J Shea and Uttam Dhillon
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Burchfield v. Alibaba Group et al
as 1:2022cv01023
Plaintiff:
Bradley C. Burchfield
Defendant:
Alibaba Group, Jack Ma, JP Morgan Chase Bank and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Burchfield v. Alibaba Group et al
as 4:2022cv00193
Plaintiff:
Bradley C Burchfield
Defendant:
Alibaba Group, Jack Ma, JP Morgan Chase Bank and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Arnett v. Norris et al
as 3:2021cv00088
Defendant:
Nurzuhal Faust, Wendy Kelley, Christopher Budnik and others
Plaintiff:
Carolyn Arnett
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LUB Hamburg, LLC et al v. Hamburg, Arkansas, City of et al
as 1:2020cv01065
Defendant:
Daniel Shelton, Maggie Ware, Dane Weindorf and others
Plaintiff:
Billy Pippen, LUB Hamburg, LLC and Scottie Pippen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hicks v. Emberton et al
as 4:2020cv00372
Plaintiff:
Charles Hicks
Defendant:
Roger Payne, Bonnie Wheeler, Steven Love and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Arnett v. Norris et al
as 1:2017cv00076
Plaintiff:
Carolyn Arnett
Defendant:
Larry Norris, Roy Hobbs, Wendy Kelley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2013cv00038
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
Crowe v. Wyeth et al
as 4:2010cv01622
Plaintiff:
Maggie E Crowe
Defendant:
Wyeth, Wyeth Pharmaceuticals Inc, Pfizer Inc and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
