Cases 21 - 30 of 149
Cardello-Smith v. JPay, LLC et al
as 2:2022cv10340
Plaintiff:
Derrick Cardello-Smith and Patricia Lee Thompson
Defendant:
JPay, LLC, JPAY- Securus/securis Technologies Company, JPAY Corporation and others
Ronald Rollings v. Federal Correctional Institution et al
as 2:2022cv00135
Plaintiff:
Ronald Rollings
Defendant:
Federal Correctional Institution, Mailroom Staff, GED and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sheppard v. Taylor et al
as 5:2021ct03371
Plaintiff:
Eric Sheppard
Defendant:
Warden C.R. Taylor, Asst. Warden Richard Duke, Director Larry Dale and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(PC) Connor v. CDC Mailroom Staff
as 2:2021cv00842
Plaintiff:
Thyrone Connor
Defendant:
CDC Mailroom Staff
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(PC) Roberts v. Richer et al
as 2:2021cv00714
Defendant:
AD - Seg. Staff, Legal Mailroom Staff, Trust Office Staff and others
Plaintiff:
David Roberts and David Nathaniel Roberts
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stone et al v. Ohio Parole Board et al
as 2:2021cv00884
Defendant:
OPB Member Glen Holmes, TCI Employee CO Cimmento, OPB Member Alicia Handwerk and others
Plaintiff:
Jamarr R. Stone, Sr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Fourstar et al v. Bidden et al
as 1:2021cv00414
Defendant:
Drew Weissman, Jessie Slaughter, Mitch McConnell and others
Plaintiff:
Victor Charles Fourstar, Jr., Anthony Pacheco, Robert Davis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Chirse v. Piccolo et al
as 6:2021cv06062
Defendant:
Supervisor Igre Martin, Southport Staff, M. Chase and others
Plaintiff:
Devante Chirse
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Chirse v. Piccolo et al
as 1:2021cv00282
Defendant:
Supervisor Igre Martin, Southport Staff, M. Chase and others
Plaintiff:
Devante Chirse
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dolberry v. Apple et al
as 9:2020cv01535
Defendant:
Craig D. Apple and Mailroom Staff
Plaintiff:
Andre Dolberry
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
