Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Ferguson v. Leabough, et al
as 1:2023cv01040
Plaintiff:
Lacy Ferguson
Defendant:
Larry Leabough, Armstrong, Major Mack and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Bivens Prisoner
Carlos Woodley v. Officer Barley
as 23-6107
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CARLOS ALROY WOODLEY
Defendant / Appellee:
OFFICER BARLEY, LIEUTENANT BROWN and LIEUTENANT SAMPLE
Defendant:
LIEUTENANT KEVIN TALLEY, SERGEANT DELOATOH, ASSISTANT SUPERINTENDENT HOLMES and others
Mack v. San Mateo County et al
as 4:2022cv00775
Plaintiff:
Major Mack
Defendant:
San Mateo County, Sheriff's Department County of San Mateo, Sheriff Carlos G. Bolanos and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Woodley v. Reed et al
as 3:2021cv00615
Plaintiff:
Carlos Alroy Woodley
Defendant:
Harold Reed, Holmes, Lt. Kevin Talley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Byrd v. Leabough et al
as 1:2021cv00438
Defendant:
Unknown, Sgt Nickleberry, Larry Leabough and others
Plaintiff:
Dionco Byrd
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kramer v. Mack et al
as 1:2021cv00308
Defendant:
Lagrom, Lt. Brown, All Riverside Jail Staff in General and others
Plaintiff:
Caleb Eric Kramer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Seifried v. Major Mack, et al
as 3:2021cv00156
Defendant:
Unknown, Officer Coleman, Officer Campbell and others
Plaintiff:
Robert Seifried
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Winston v. Unknown
as 1:2020cv01481
Plaintiff:
Brandon L. Winston
Defendant:
Unknown, Officer Hoy, Major Mack and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Major-Mack v. Organon USA, Inc. et al
as 4:2014cv00691
Plaintiff:
Rhonda Major-Mack
Defendant:
Organon USA, Inc. , Organon Pharmaceutical USA Inc , Organon International, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Major-Mack v. Organon USA, Inc. et al
as CAN/3:13-cv-05421
Plaintiff:
Rhonda Major-Mack
Defendant:
Organon USA, Inc. , Organon Pharmaceutical USA Inc. , Organon International, Inc. and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
