Cases 11 - 20 of 69
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv02649
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
OH v. Shardaye Bey
as 23-3449
Plaintiff / Appellee:
STATE OF OHIO
Defendant / Appellant:
SHARDAYE JEACOLE MALIK BEY
EL-MALIK-BEY ALI v. LIEBEL
as 1:2023cv00886
Plaintiff:
MUFTI ABDUL EL-MALIK-BEY ALI
Defendant:
DAVID LIEBEL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
El-Malik-Bey-Ali v. Liebel
as 3:2023cv00396
Plaintiff:
Mufti Abdul El-Malik-Bey Ali
Defendant:
David Liebel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Shardaye Bey v. Barbara Sessler, et al
as 23-3421
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SHARDAYE JEACOLE MALIK BEY
Defendant / Appellee:
BARBARA A. SESSLER, County Recorder, JASON R. HINNERS, Assistant Prosecutor, LUVADA S. WILSON, County Clerk of Court and others
EL MALIK-BEY v. LIEBEL
as 1:2023cv00745
Plaintiff:
MUFTI ABDUL EL MALIK-BEY
Defendant:
DAVID LIEBEL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Khali Malik Bey et al v. Los Angeles County et al
as 2:2023cv03436
Plaintiff:
Khali Malik Bey, Kimberly Gant EL, Kyon Taylor and others
Defendant:
Los Angeles County, DCFS, LAPD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Ali v. Liebel et al
as 3:2023cv00346
Plaintiff:
Mufti Abdul El-Malik-Bey Ali, Muft Abdul El-Malik- Ali, Frances L Smith-Bey and others
Defendant:
David Liebel, Ismael Aleem, William Croto and others
Not Classified By Court:
MIAMI E-FILE(Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BEY v. KEMP et al
as 5:2023cv00115
Plaintiff:
ABDUL MALIK BEY Secured Party doing business as GRADY RENARD WILLIAMS, JR
Defendant:
BRIAN KEMP, TYRONE OLIVER and JENNIFER WILSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BEY v. OLIVER et al
as 5:2023cv00086
Plaintiff:
ABDUL MALIK BEY
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER TYRONE OLIVER, WARDEN CHARLES MIMS and WILCOX STATE PRISON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
