Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 11
JOHNSON v. KAUFFMAN et al
as 2:2021cv02561
Defendant: SUPERINTENDENT KEVEN KAUFFMAN, DISTRICT ATTORNEY FOR PHILA COUNTY and ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR PENNSYLVANIA
Petitioner: MALIK JOHNSON
Respondent: SUPERINTENDENT KEVIN KAUFFMAN, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF PHILADELPHIA and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Malik Johnson v. Gilbert Shannon, et al
as 20-13634
Defendant / Appellee: MONIQUE ROSCOE and GILBERT SHANNON
Plaintiff / Appellant: MALIK JOHNSON
Johnson v. White We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2019cv02183
Respondent: Warden Douglas K. White
Petitioner: Antonio Malik Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv06041
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv03814
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Johnson v. Shannon et al
as 1:2019cv00670
Plaintiff: Malik Johnson
Defendant: Monique Roscoe, CSO FNU Gilbert, Jane and/or John Doe 1-3 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. City of Chicago, et al
as 1:2016cv07593
Plaintiff: Malik Johnson
Defendant: City Of Chicago and Unknown Police Officers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv01230
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
USA v. Nasim Perkin
as 08-2299
Plaintiff - Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant: NASIM PERKINS, also known as MALIK JOHNSON also known as ARTHUR PERKINS also known as RONNIE REAGAN
Johnson v. USA
as 1:2008cv00181
Respondent: USA
Petitioner: Albari Malik Johnson
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?