Cases 1 - 10 of 178
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv01133
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Gage v. Mayo Clinic, et al.
as 23-4410
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MALLY GAGE
Defendant / Appellee:
MAYO CLINIC and MAYO CLINIC ARIZONA
Gage v. United States Equal Employment Opportunity Commission
as 23-4232
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MALLY GAGE
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION
C. v. Rashid et al
as 2:2023cv02056
Defendant:
Jamal Rashid, Caesar's Entertainment, Inc., Mally Mall and others
Plaintiff:
C. C.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Tort Action
Ruelas et al v. MGT Trucking LLC et al
as 6:2023cv01685
Plaintiff:
Raul Ruelas and Paula Ruelas
Defendant:
MGT Trucking LLc, Gurmit Malli, XYZ Companies or Corporations and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv05139
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Buckner et al v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2023cv02958
Plaintiff:
Judith Buckner and Mallie Buckner
Defendant:
3M Company and Arizant Healthcare, Inc.
Branch v. Pelto
as 3:2023cv00568
Plaintiff:
Mallie Branch
Defendant:
Elizabeth Pelto
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv02871
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
John Arnaldi, et al v. Glenmark Pharmaceuticals, Inc. USA, et al
as 23-11247
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOHN A. ARNALDI, PAULA ARNALDI, EDWARD M. BOOTH, JR. and others
Defendant / Appellee:
GLENMARK PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. USA, MARLENE GOLDENBERG, APOTEX CORP. and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
