Cases 11 - 20 of 33
Ates v. Azrack et al
as 2:2020cv03590
Defendant:
Mark C. Dillon, Linda Christopher, Ruth C. Balkin and others
Plaintiff:
Murat Ates
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Attallah v. Maltese et al
as 2:2020cv01889
Defendant:
Daniel Milstein, Douglas Catalano and Joseph Maltese
Plaintiff:
Ahdy Attallah
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Ates v. Altiner et al
as 2:2020cv01477
Defendant:
Paul B. Harding, Mark C. Dillion, Linda Christopher and others
Plaintiff:
Murat Ates
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Faughnan et al v. AMAG, Inc.
as 3:2019cv01394
Defendant:
AMAG, Inc. and Amag Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Teresa Faughnan and Jennifer Maltese
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Gochnour v. Burri
as 19-1091
Defendant:
M. Hadfield, Mr. Chaffer, W. Sidel and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Michael John Gochnour
Defendant / Appellee:
Douglas J. Lynch, Arthur M. White, Chad B. Turner and others
Maltese et al v. Brunswick Corporation et al
as 2:2018cv07244
Defendant:
Marinemax of NY, Inc., Brunswick Corporation, Marinemax Services, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Faryn Weinstein Maltese and Albert Maltese
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Maltese et al v. Brunswick Corporation et al
as 2:2018cv07244
Defendant:
Marinemax of NY, Inc., Brunswick Corporation, Marinemax Services, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Faryn Weinstein Maltese and Albert Maltese
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv02978
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
v. DeSocio et al
as 5:2018cv00302
Defendant:
Catherine Leahy Scott, Officer Babcock, L. Jones and others
Claimant:
Richard DeSocio
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Maltese v. Colvin
as 6:2018cv06188
Petitioner:
Mark J. Maltese
Respondent:
Colvin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
