Cases 21 - 30 of 78
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv08817
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2019cv01908
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2019cv01748
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2019cv00086
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Beach Dreaming LLC et al v. Waldorf Auto Toy Store et al
as 8:2019cv00745
Defendant:
Manheim Remarketing Inc, Darcars Dodge of New Carrollton, Waldorf Auto Toy Store and others
Plaintiff:
Jacob Faulkner, Mathew Charlesworth and Beach Dreaming LLC
Cause Of Action: 49 U.S.C. § 32701
Pastorek v. Manheim Remarketing, Inc. et al
as 1:2018cv02407
Defendant:
Manheim Remarketing, Inc. and Cox Enterprises, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Michelle Pastorek
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Easterling et al v. Manheim Remarketing Inc
as 4:2018cv01648
Plaintiff:
Richard Thomas Easterling and Gina Easterling
Defendant:
Manheim Remarketing Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Manheim Remarketing, Inc. v. Mall Auto Outlet, Inc. et al
as 1:2018cv02434
Plaintiff:
Manheim Remarketing, Inc.
Defendant:
Mall Auto Outlet, Inc. , Charles Arnao, Sr. and Charles Arnao, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Manheim Remarketing, Inc. v. Carolina Auto Exports, Inc. et al
as 3:2017mc00178
Plaintiff:
Manheim Remarketing, Inc.
Defendant:
Carolina Auto Exports, Inc. and Tariq Alsarraj
Taylor v. Manheim Remarketing, Inc.
as 17-3973
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Neville Taylor
Defendant - Appellee:
Manheim Remarketing, Inc., DBA Manheim NY Metro Skyline
Defendant:
Manheim Automotive Dealer Services, Inc, Manheim Auctions, Inc., Manheim, Inc. and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
