Cases 1 - 10 of 16
AYON v. FOSTER et al
as 1:2024cv00756
Plaintiff:
MANUEL GARCIA AYON, JR.
Defendant:
FOSTER, AFOLAYAN, BISHOP and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv15001
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. $299,745.00 IN UNITED STATES CURRENCY
as 1:2023cv01584
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
$299,745.00 IN UNITED STATES CURRENCY
Claimant:
JOSE MANUEL GARCIA, JR.
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 881 Forfeiture Property-Drugs
RUSTIA v. RN STAFF INC. et al
as 1:2021cv02477
Plaintiff:
MA. LUISA RUSTIA
Defendant:
RN STAFF INC. and MANUEL GARCIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
SALCEDO v. RN STAFF INC. et al
as 1:2021cv01161
Defendant:
ARVIN AMATORIO, MANUEL GARCIA, RAMON VILLEGAS and others
Plaintiff:
PATROCINIO F. SALCEDO and MA. PATROCINIO F. SALCEDO
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Harvinder Dhani, et al v. Visa, Inc., et al
as 20-3211
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MANUEL GARCIA and HARVINDER DHANI
Defendant / Appellee:
STRIPE, INC. and VISA, INC.
DHANI et al v. VISA, INC. et al
as 1:2019cv04987
Defendant:
STRIPE, INC., VISA INC. and VISA, INC.
Plaintiff:
MANUEL GARCIA and HARVINDER DHANI
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
HERNANDEZ v. RN STAFF INC. et al
as 1:2019cv03203
Defendant:
Manuel Garcia and RN STAFF INC
Plaintiff:
CZESAR HERNANDEZ
USA v. Manuel Garcia
as 17-2340
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
MANUEL GARCIA
PANWAR v. ACCESS THERAPIES, INC et al
as 1:2012cv00619
Plaintiff:
RITURAJ SINGH PANWAR and MICHAEL RICHARD BAUTISTA AGUSTIN
Defendant:
ACCESS THERAPIES, INC, RN STAFF INC doing business as REHABILITY CARE, RAMON VILLEGAS and others
Counter Claimant:
RN STAFF INC
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
