Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00610
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Sharp Inspection Group, Inc. et al v. City of Sacramento et al
as 2:2019cv02156
Defendant:
Marc Lee and City of Sacramento
Plaintiff:
Sharp Inspection Group, Inc., Fred Sharp and Robert Sharp
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sharp Inspection Group, Inc. et al v. City of Sacramento et al
as 2:2019at01014
Defendant:
Marc Lee and City of Sacramento
Plaintiff:
Sharp Inspection Group, Inc., Fred Sharp and Robert Sharp
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bellucci v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration
as 0:2017cv03420
Plaintiff:
Marc Lee Bellucci
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Aschilew Jember v. County of Santa Clara, et al
as 17-16589
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ASCHILEW JEMBER
Defendant - Appellee:
COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA, MIKE WASSERMAN, CINDY CHAVEZ and others
Jember v. County of Santa Clara et al
as 5:2017cv03883
Plaintiff:
Aschilew Jember
Defendant:
County of Santa Clara, Mike Wasserman, Cindy Chavez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
United States of America v. Franco
as 17-891
Appellee USA:
United States of America
Defendant - Appellant:
Paul Franco, AKA Paul Louis Vendredi, AKA Paul Pastore, AKA Marc Merrill, AKA Marc Lee Merril, AKA Paul Michael Pastore
In re: Marc Bass, et al v. Marc Bass
as 14-56247
Debtor:
In the Matter of: MARC LEE BASS
Appellant:
BEACON TALENT AGENCY, INC., AKA Marc Bass Agency, Inc.
Appellee:
MARC LEE BASS
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2013cv07707
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
In Re Debtor:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
US v. Marc Wertz
as 12-4503
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
MARC LEE WERTZ
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
