Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Howard v. Davis et al
as 1:2021cv04163
Plaintiff:
Andrenique Howard
Defendant:
Corleon Davis, Corleon Phillips, Corleon Milles and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Benjamin et al v. Justice and Public Safety Cabinet et al
as 3:2020cv00556
Defendant:
Patricia Gunter, Justice and Public Safety Cabinet, Kentucky Department of Corrections and others
Plaintiff:
Dion "Israel Ma Luther, Marcus Benjamin, Chadwick Gilbert and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HILLER v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv95609
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
MARCUS BENJAMIN HILLER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BENJAMIN v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2020cv01352
Defendant:
AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and 3M COMPANY
Plaintiff:
MARCUS BENJAMIN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
HENRY et al v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2019cv03078
Plaintiff:
WESLEY BRAND, HADRIAN CLEAGUE, VICTOR VOLYNETS and others
Defendant:
3M COMPANY and AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Harrison v. Crick et al
as 0:2019cv00081
Defendant:
Jason D. Bambel, Shelbi Helton, Peggy Adams and others
Plaintiff:
James Harrison
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Henry et al v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2019cv02082
Plaintiff:
Wesley Brand, Hadrian Cleague, Victor Volynets and others
Defendant:
3M Company and Aearo Technologies, LLC
Harrison v. Crick et al
as 5:2019cv00075
Defendant:
Jason D. Bambel, Shelbi Helton, Peggy Adams and others
Plaintiff:
James Harrison
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Marcus Ward v. Sherman Champen, et al
as 12-15084
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MARCUS BENJAMIN WARD
Defendant - Appellee:
SHERMAN CHAMPEN, N.P., CLARK KELSO, Receiver, ANDREASEN and others
Benjamin, Marcus v. HSU Staff Medical Service et al
as 3:2010cv00526
Plaintiff:
Marcus Benjamin
Defendant:
HSU Staff Medical Service , Bells , Fisher and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
