Cases 1 - 10 of 17
Herrera v. Mezcales Mexican Bar & Grill Inc. et al
as 4:2021cv01224
Counter Defendant:
Maricela Garcia Herrera
Counter Claimant:
Mezcales Mexican Bar & Grill Inc., Hiovany J. Nieto Avalos, Judith Nieto and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv00256
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
GARCIA v. HOLTZMAN TRUCKING CO., INC. et al
as 3:2021cv00125
Plaintiff:
MARICELA GARCIA
Defendant:
HOLTZMAN TRUCKING CO., INC., DAVID WALKER and RUXER FORD LINCOLN, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Garcia Barajas et al v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2021cv02561
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Maricela Garcia and Ignacio Garcia Barajas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Garcia v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2020cv05066
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff:
Maricela Garcia
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2017cv05024
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
USA v. Berla Garcia
as 16-10253
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
BERLA MARICELA GARCIA
Harkey v. Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc. (MERS) et al
as 2:2015cv01378
Defendant:
Patricia Babb, Catherine L. Dean, Executive Trustee Services and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Harkey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345 Foreclosure
J&J Sports Productions, Inc. v. Arriba El Norte Nightclub et al
as 2:2015cv01068
Defendant:
Arriba El Norte Nightclub and Maricela Garcia
Plaintiff:
J&J Sports Productions, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed Question: Fed Communications Act of 1
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2014cv02832
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Americans with Disabilities Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
