Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Hammond et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2016cv11924
Plaintiff:
Susan Marie Hammond and Victor H. Hammond
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hammond et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2015cv12407
Plaintiff:
Lisa Marie Hammond and Mark A. Hammond
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Rigsby et al v. American Medical Systems, Inc.
as 2:2014cv25539
Defendant:
American Medical Systems, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Lia Rigsby , Bunnie Piehowski , Janet Aherens and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Haway v. Evans et al
as 0:2014cv00534
Plaintiff:
Tyler Sebastian Haway
Defendant:
Ralph Evans, Rick Clark, Mary Hammond and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Haway v. Clark et al
as 0:2013cv03384
Plaintiff:
Tyler Sebastian Haway
Defendant:
Rick Clark, Mary Hammond and Tammy Hamilton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rodney Young v. Christopher Griffin
as 13-7940
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RODNEY DAVID YOUNG
Defendant - Appellee:
CHRISTOPHER GRIFFIN, TAMMY HAMILTON, DR. MARY HAMMOND and others
Hammond v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2013cv19194
Plaintiff:
Rose Marie Hammond
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc., Ethicon, LLC and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
McCall v. Leapord et al
as 2:2013cv01259
Plaintiff:
Terry Edward McCall
Defendant:
Christy Leapord, Officer Sewwell, Tammy Hamilton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Young v. Griffin et al
as 1:2012cv03009
Plaintiff:
Rodney David Young
Defendant:
Christopher Griffin, Tammy Hamilton and Mary Hammond
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Crouchman v. Pickens County LEC Jail et al
as 9:2012cv02231
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey William Crouchman
Defendant:
Pickens County LEC Jail, Keith Galloway, Drew Sisco and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
