Cases 31 - 40 of 118
LOPEZ-SANCHEZ v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv06414
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
MARIO LOPEZ-SANCHEZ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Brown v. Protective Insurance Company, et al
as 2:2019cv13710
Defendant:
Mario Lopez and Protective Insurance Company
Plaintiff:
Ellnisha Brown and Ellneisha Brown
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Helen Langley et al v. City of Los Angeles et al
as 2:2017cv05490
Defendant:
Sargeant Sandoz, Officer Reyes, City of Los Angeles and others
Plaintiff:
Darrell Smith, Irvin Anderson, Helen Langley and others
Alternative Dispute Resolution (Adr) Provider:
Richard T. Copeland
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Szplett v. Kenco Logistic Services, LLC et al
as 1:2019cv02500
Defendant:
Jay Elliott, Trace Spier, Kelvin Walsh and others
Plaintiff:
Leonard A Szplett
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv03193
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Lopez Cuyuch v. Wealthy Trade Inc. et al
as 1:2019cv00794
Plaintiff:
Mario Lopez Cuyuch and Alex
Defendant:
Raga Corp., Bakul Miah, Tanit Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
US v. Mario Lopez-Godinez
as 19-4065
Defendant / Appellant:
MARIO LOPEZ-GODINEZ
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Lopez v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2019cv01061
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Mario Lopez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Lopez v. 695 Leon Bakery, Inc. et al
as 1:2018cv12365
Defendant:
695 Leon Bakery, Inc. and Klever Leon
Plaintiff:
Mario Lopez and Bonifacio Solis Guzman
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Lopez et al v. Hendrick et al
as 1:2018cv04462
Plaintiff:
Mario Lopez and Roberto Lozano
Defendant:
John Hendrick, Pam Hendrick and Bilika, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
