Cases 1 - 10 of 39
Williams v. Irwin et al
as 1:2023cv01352
Petitioner:
Mark Alonzo Williams
Respondent:
Glenn Irwin and Pennsylvania Attorney General's Office
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
WILLIAMS, SR. v. LOFTUS et al
as 5:2021cv05590
Plaintiff:
MARK A. WILLIAMS, SR.
Defendant:
FRANK LOFTUS, LOFTUS ADJUSTMENT, KELLY GOBLIN and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
WILLIAMS, SR. v. LOFTUS et al
as 2:2021cv05590
Plaintiff:
MARK A. WILLIAMS, SR.
Defendant:
FRANK LOFTUS, LOFTUS ADJUSTMENT and KELLY GOBLIN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Williams v. Loftus Adjustment Company et al
as 1:2020cv00512
Defendant:
Jherion Levesque, Doe 1, Frank Hurst and others
Plaintiff:
Mark A. Williams, Sr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Mark-Alonzo Williams v. John Wetzel, et al
as 20-1337
Defendant / Appellee:
MICHAEL MAHALLY, SUPERINTENDENT, SCI DALLAS, JOSEPH ZAKARAUSKAS, DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT, SCI DALLAS, JOHN WETZEL, SECRETARY PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MARK-ALONZO WILLIAMS
Mark Williams v. Superintendent Greene SCI, et al
as 19-2378
Defendant / Appellee:
SUPERINTENDENT GREENE SCI, ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA and DISTRICT ATTORNEY DELAWARE COUNTY
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MARK L. WILLIAMS
WALKER v. WILLIAMS
as 1:2019cv00021
Petitioner:
RAYMOND WALKER
Respondent:
MARK K. WILLIAMS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
WILEY v. WILLIAMS
as 1:2019cv00019
Petitioner:
CLAUDE WILEY, JR.
Respondent:
MARK K. WILLIAMS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
O'CONNOR v. WILLIAMS
as 1:2019cv00020
Petitioner:
ARIAN O'CONNOR
Respondent:
MARK K. WILLIAMS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
WILLIAMS v. THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY et al
as 3:2019cv00573
Respondent:
THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY and TRACY SHIMONIS-KAMINSKI
Petitioner:
MARK S. WILLIAMS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
