Cases 1 - 10 of 56
Glover v. Shaver et al
as 4:2024cv00027
Plaintiff:
Joshua James Glover
Defendant:
Shalon Shaver, Mark Davis, Michelle Walker and others
Not Yet Classified:
Prisoner Litigation Unit
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Davis v. USA
as 8:2022cv00269
Petitioner:
Mark Davis
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Hooks v. Davis et al
as 1:2022cv00200
Plaintiff:
Michael Hooks
Defendant:
Mark Davis, Scott DeLeerda and John . Davis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Lollis v. Zell et al
as 2:2022cv00486
Plaintiff:
William Lollis and William Matthew Lollis
Defendant:
Zell, Brian Kibler, Connie Gippson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Walker v. Grether et al
as 2:2022cv00463
Plaintiff:
Joevon Walker and Joevon Viyale Walker
Defendant:
K. Grether, G. Jones, Rose Ann Ellis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Walker v. Grether et al
as 4:2022cv01120
Plaintiff:
Joevon Walker
Defendant:
K. Grether, G. Jones, Rose Ann Ellis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Troxell v. Davis
as 1:2020cv00009
Plaintiff:
Joshua Aaron Troxell
Defendant:
Mark Davis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Troxell v. Davis The plaintiffs pending motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis [Doc. # 2] is DENIED at this time without prejudice to reconsideration by the Eastern District of Texas after this case has been transferred.
as 4:2019cv04967
Plaintiff:
Joshua Aaron Troxell
Defendant:
Sheriff Mark Davis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(PC) Hicks v. Davis et al
as 2:2019cv02424
Plaintiff:
Michael J. Hicks
Defendant:
Mark Davis and Salahuddin Abdur-Rahman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Davis v. No Name Respondent
as 1:2019cv03371
Petitioner:
Mark Davis
Respondent:
No Name Respondent
Defendant:
Barnhart
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
