Cases 1 - 10 of 28
Ferguson v. General Motors, LLC et al
as 2:2022cv00388
Plaintiff:
John Mark Ferguson
Defendant:
General Motors, LLC
Counter Claimant:
Lear Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv01222
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022at00732
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Moeckler v. City of Glendale et al
as 2:2021cv00537
Plaintiff:
phillip moeckler
Defendant:
City of Glendale Police Chief Mark Ferguson, city of glendale alderman steven schmelzing and city of Glendale
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
moeckler v. City of Glendale Wisconsin et al
as 2:2021cv00518
Plaintiff:
phillip moeckler
Defendant:
City of Glendale Wisconsin, Alderman steven schmelzing and Police Chief Mark Ferguson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wilcox v. Gartland et al
as 1:2021cv10429
Defendant:
Mark Ferguson, Tawas City, City of and Ryan Gartland
Plaintiff:
Keith A. Wilcox
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sashital et al v. SEVA Beauty, LLC et al
as 1:2020cv04692
Defendant:
SEVA Beauty, LLC and Kari Comrov
Plaintiff:
Michael Scott Davis, Mark Ferguson and Mahesh Sashital
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
FERGUSON v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv35961
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
MARK FERGUSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Bryan Gipson v. Tawas Police Authority, et al
as 19-1429
Defendant / Appellee:
MARK FERGUSON, CITY OF EAST TAWAS, MI, CITY OF TAWAS CITY, MI and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
BRYAN GIPSON
Turner v. Ferguson et al
as 2:2018cv00815
Plaintiff:
Lori Turner
Defendant:
Mark Ferguson, Kip Butler, Joshua Ruppel and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
