Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Poker Unicorns LLC v. Lively et al
as 8:2023cv02816
Plaintiff:
Poker Unicorns LLC
Defendant:
Jacob Lively, Barry Lively, Johnny Paglino and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2021cv00253
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Minter v. Burke et al
as 2:2018cv01193
Plaintiff:
Geraldine W Minter
Defendant:
Jim Burke Hyundai Alabama Corporation, Jim Burke, Jr, Jim Burke Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
BOKF NA v. Barnett et al
as 2:2018cv00613
Plaintiff:
BOKF NA
Defendant:
Herman Barnett , Carol Barron , Estrellita Louise De La Torre and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Nezbeda et al v. Liberty Mutual Insurance Corporation et al
as 1:2017cv01261
Plaintiff:
David Andrew Nezbeda and Heidi Christine Nezbeda
Defendant:
Liberty Mutual Insurance Corporation , Gillian O'Nan, Mark Edward McRorie and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 241
Platte River Insurance Company v. Marks et al
as 2:2015cv01747
Plaintiff:
Platte River Insurance Company
Defendant:
Dean Richard Marks, Sarilee Marks, The Marks Living Trust and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Able Fence Co. Profit Sharing Plan et al v. Heartland Resources, Inc. et al
as 1:2008cv00143
Plaintiff:
Able Fence Co. Profit Sharing Plan, Able Fence Co. Profit Sharing Plan, Able Fence Co. Profit Sharing Plan and others
Defendant:
Heartland Resources, Inc., Heartland Holding Company, Inc., Heartland Drilling, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Clayton et al v. Heartland Resources, Inc. et al
as 1:2008cv00094
Plaintiff:
Frederick P. Clayton, Kent B. Monypeny, Beverly Ackert and others
Consolidated Plaintiff:
Able Fence Co. Profit Sharing Plan, Mary Susan Arditi, Edward G. Adams and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77 Securities Fraud
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
