Civil Rights Cases
DOE 4 et al v. MAPLES et al
as 4:2023cv00034
Plaintiff: JANE DOE 4 and JANE DOE 8
Defendant: SCOTTIE MAPLES, DAVID LOWE, MARK MEYER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Daniel Rudd v. City of Norton Shores, et al
as 22-1229
Plaintiff / Appellant: DANIEL WILLIAM RUDD
Defendant / Appellee: CITY OF NORTON SHORES, GARY NELUND, Mayor; individually and in his official capacity, DANIEL SHAW, Police Chief; individually and in his official capacity and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv00876
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Rudd v. Norton Shores, City of et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2018cv00124
Plaintiff: Daniel William Rudd
Defendant: Norton Shores, City of , Gary Nelund , Daniel Shaw and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Michael Jones, et al v. County of Los Angeles, et al
as 12-56921
Plaintiff - Appellant: MICHAEL N. JONES, an individual, JILL JONES, an individual and G. J., an individual, by and through his guardian ad litem, Mark Meyers
Defendant - Appellee: COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, LOS ANGELES COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILY SERVICES, THE OFFICE OF COUNTY COUNSEL FOR LOS ANGELES COUNTY and others
Defendant: CITY OF SANTA MONICA, CITY OF SANTA MONICA POLICE DEPARTMENT, CLAUDIA WANG, an individual and others
Robert Wells v. City of Dearborn Heights, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 12-1051
Plaintiff - Appellant: ROBERT WELLS
Defendant - Appellee: CITY OF DEARBORN HEIGHTS, BARR, BOLJESIC and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2010cv00398
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Wells v. Dearborn Heights, City of et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2010cv10543
Plaintiff: Robert Wells
Defendant: Dearborn Heights, City of, Barr, Boljesic and others

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?