Cases 1 - 10 of 40
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2026cv02631
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Roth v. 3M Company, f/k/a Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Company et al
as 2:2026cv04435
Plaintiff:
Mark Roth
Defendant:
3M Company, f/k/a Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Company, AGC Chemicals Americas Inc., Arkema, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Phillis et al v. 3M Company et al
as 2:2025cv11689
Plaintiff:
Donald Phillis, Robert Phipps, Alan Pier and others
Defendant:
3M Company, AGC Chemical Americas Inc., Amerex Corp and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Phillis et al v. 3M Company et al
as 2:2025cv11690
Plaintiff:
Donald Phillis, Robert Phipps, Alan Pier and others
Defendant:
3M Company, AGC Chemical Americas Inc., Amerex Corp and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
MARK v 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv06956
Plaintiff:
MARK ROTH and ROTH MARK
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Coomer v. Roth
as 23-10845
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Tracey Harris Coomer
Defendant / Appellee:
Mark Roth, Warden Arnold, Daisha B. Simmons and others
Coomer v. Roth
as 21-10182
Defendant / Appellee:
Mickenzie M. Gill, Julie A. Marguez, Anthony R.. Marguez, Sgt. and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Tracey Harris Coomer
ROTH v. Monsanto Company
as 3:2020cv08175
Plaintiff:
Mark Roth
Defendant:
Monsanto Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Roth v. Monsanto Company
as 1:2020cv05734
Plaintiff:
Mark Roth
Defendant:
Monsanto Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Roth v. Davol, Inc. et al.
as 2:2019cv02699
Defendant:
Davol, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Mark Roth and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
