Cases 1 - 10 of 28
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv06011
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
National Liability and Fire Insurance Company v. Lindsay F. Nielson et al
as 2:2023cv02266
Plaintiff:
National Liability & Fire Insurance Company, a Connecticut corporation and National Liability and Fire Insurance Company
Defendant:
Lindsay F. Nielson, Steven Rall and Mark Sims
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
HILL v. SULLIVAN et al
as 5:2021cv00222
Plaintiff:
JEFFERY DUSHAWN HILL
Defendant:
CHRISTIAN SULLIVAN and HENRY MARK SIMS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Keith Henderson v. Wade Mercer, et al
as 21-12462
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KEITH HENDERSON
Defendant / Appellee:
WADE MERCER, HENRY MARK SIMS, ELISABETH SIMPSON and others
Keith Henderson v. Wade Mercer, et al
as 21-12235
Defendant / Appellee:
HENRY MARK SIMS, ELISABETH SIMPSON, LAUREN PARRISH and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KEITH HENDERSON
Henderson v. Mercer et al
as 3:2021cv00620
Defendant:
Ashley Moody, Donald Bryant, Timothy Hardrick and others
Plaintiff:
Keith Henderson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HENDERSON v. ARNOLD et al
as 1:2021cv00088
Defendant:
WADE OWENS, LAUREN PARISH, Judge WADE MERCER and others
Plaintiff:
KEITH HENDERSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HENDERSON v. ARNOLD et al
as 4:2021cv00180
Defendant:
LAUREN PARISH, ASHLEY MOODY, SHARON JENNING and others
Plaintiff:
KEITH HENDERSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HENDERSON v. MERCER et al
as 7:2021cv00053
Defendant:
ASHLEY MOODY, DONALD BRYANT, JUDGE W LOUIS SANDS and others
Plaintiff:
KEITH HENDERSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Henderson v. Arnold, et al
as 3:2021cv01867
Plaintiff:
Keith Henderson
Defendant:
Office of the Henry Mark Sims Public Defender 14th Judicial Circuit, Lauren Parish, Ashley Moody and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
