Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Lewis v. Jegley et al
as 4:2019cv00238
Defendant:
Mireille Delbecq, Does 1-2, Designee/proxy, Pulaski County Prosecutor's Office, M Swagerty and others
Plaintiff:
Arron Michael Lewis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Christopher Kiesling, et al v. Ross Spurlock
as 16-2197
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Christopher Kiesling and Katy Kiesling
Defendant:
Doc Holladay, Individually, and in his official capacity as Sheriff of Pulaski County, AR, Mark Swagerty, Individually, and in his official capacity as a Pulaski County Sheriff Deputy, Cardarious Walker, Individually, and in his official capacity as a Pulaski County Sheriff Deputy and others
Defendant - Appellant:
Ross Spurlock, in his individual capacity only
Lewis v. Johnson et al
as 4:2015cv00630
Plaintiff:
Arron Michael Lewis
Defendant:
John F Johnson, Jackson Bennett, Jose Garcia and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kiesling et al v. Holladay et al
as 4:2015cv00390
Plaintiff:
Christopher Kiesling and Katy Kiesling
Defendant:
Doc Holladay , Mark Swagerty , Cardarious Walker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Swagerty v. Palagummi et al
as 2:2012cv00102
Plaintiff:
Mark Swagerty
Defendant:
Sambrajya Palagummi, Michelle Street and E. Washington
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Swagerty v. Cate
as 2:2012cv00030
Petitioner:
Mark Swagerty
Respondent:
Matthew Cate
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Swagerty v. Cate et al
as 2:2011cv02102
Plaintiff:
Mark Swagerty, Jr.
Defendant:
Matthew Cate and S. M. Salinas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Swagerty v. State of California et al
as 1:2010cv01422
Plaintiff:
Mark Swagerty
Defendant:
State of California and California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Swagerty v. State of California et al
as 2:2010cv02157
Plaintiff:
Mark Swagerty
Defendant:
State of California and California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
