Cases 1 - 10 of 27
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 9:2023cv05045
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Marquez v. Cooper et al
as 6:2022cv04592
Plaintiff:
Emily Marquez
Defendant:
Jonathon Cooper, Brayden Leopold, Justice Rallis and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Spann-Mitchell v. Sheriff Kristin Graziano
as 0:2021cv03153
Petitioner:
Marquez Mitchell-Spann and Marquez Spann-Mitchell
Respondent:
Sheriff Al Cannon, Sheriff Al Cannon Detention Center, Warden, Sheriff Al Cannon Detention Center and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Kinard v. Stirling et al
as 8:2021cv01077
Defendant:
Sam Ray, Mark Bethea, Dennis Patterson and others
Plaintiff:
Keaston D. Kinard
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mast v. Stirling et al
as 8:2021cv01074
Defendant:
Sam Ray, Mark Bethea, Dennis Patterson and others
Plaintiff:
Randy L. Mast
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brooks v. Stirling et al
as 8:2021cv01076
Defendant:
Sam Ray, Mark Bethea, Dennis Patterson and others
Plaintiff:
Emonte A. Brooks
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brooks v. Stirling et al
as 8:2021cv01075
Defendant:
Sam Ray, Mark Bethea, Dennis Patterson and others
Plaintiff:
Daiquan L. Brooks
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nesbit, Jr. v. Stirling et al
as 8:2021cv00960
Defendant:
Sam Ray, Kenneth Sharp, Mark Bethea and others
Plaintiff:
Henry Nesbit, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brown v. Sumter-Lee Regional Detention Center et al
as 4:2021cv00670
Defendant:
Lt. Reddick, Sr. Cpl. Abraham, Lt. John Shirah and others
Plaintiff:
Demetrius Alexander Brown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Montgomery v. Stirling et al
as 8:2021cv00632
Plaintiff:
Chancellor Deshawn Montgomery
Defendant:
Sam Ray, C/O Jackson, Kenneth Sharp and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
