Cases 1 - 10 of 80
Marrero v. CR Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv03126
Plaintiff:
Edwin Marrero
Defendant:
CR Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Lee et al v. Memphis Police Department et al
as 2:2023cv02170
Plaintiff:
Wendolyn Lee, Lakendria Madson and Karlos Thomas
Defendant:
Memphis Police Department, Floyd Bonner, W. Marrero and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Marrero v. Gilley
as 6:2023cv00038
Petitioner:
Edwin Marrero
Respondent:
J. Gilley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Marrero v. Anthony et al
as 1:2022cv01341
Plaintiff:
Tito E. Marrero
Defendant:
Stephen Anthony, David Kasulones, Private Security Company Contracted at Louis Stokes for Security and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Marrero v. CR Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2022cv02742
Plaintiff:
Edgar Marrero
Defendant:
CR Bard, Inc. and Davol Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Marrero v. Warden, USP McCreary et al
as 6:2022cv00125
Plaintiff:
Edwin Marrero
Defendant:
Warden, USP McCreary and John and Jane Doe(s)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Marrero v. Veterans Administration et al
as 1:2022cv01085
Plaintiff:
Tito E. Marrero
Defendant:
Veterans Administration, Christopher Robey, Myron Head and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Marrero et al v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2022cv01940
Plaintiff:
Miguel Marrero and Marisel Maisonet
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Marrero-Perez v. Yanfeng US Automotive Interior Systems II LLC
as 3:2021cv00645
Plaintiff:
Victor Marrero-Perez
Defendant:
Yanfeng US Automotive Interior Systems II LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 fm
USA v. Juan Marrero
as 21-2853
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
JUAN EUGENIO MARRERO
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
