Cases 1 - 10 of 43
Jonassen v. Jacquez, et al.
as 24-2334
Plaintiff:
MARTIN JOSEPH JONASSEN
Defendant:
I. JACQUEZ, D. SUH, B. CRAY and others
Aboda, Inc. et al v. Abode By Reside LLC et al
as 1:2024cv02729
Plaintiff:
Aboda, Inc. and Reside Worldwide Inc.
Defendant:
Abode By Reside LLC, Reside New York LLC, Metropolitan Realty Exemptions, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Jonassen v. Jacquez, et al.
as 24-32
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MARTIN JOSEPH JONASSEN
Defendant / Appellee:
I. JACQUEZ, Warden, D. SUH, Chaplain, B. CRAY, Counselor and others
Jonassen, et al. v. Warden of Sheridan FCI
as 23-2097
Petitioner / Appellant:
MARTIN JOSEPH JONASSEN and ELIZABETH MARY JONASSEN
Respondent / Appellee:
WARDEN OF SHERIDAN FCI
Gormley v. Lumpkin
as 23-20271
Petitioner / Appellant:
Martin Joseph Gormley, III
Respondent / Appellee:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
Jonassen et al v. Warden of Sheridan FCI
as 3:2023cv00646
Petitioner:
Martin Joseph Jonassen and Elizabeth Mary Jonassen
Respondent:
Warden of Sheridan FCI
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al v. O'BRIEN
as 2:2023cv00049
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and STATE OF MAINE
Defendant:
MARTIN JOSEPH O'BRIEN
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729 False Claims Act
Gormley v. Lumpkin
as 4:2022cv04087
Petitioner:
Martin Joseph Gormley, III
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv07455
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv04666
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
