Cases 21 - 30 of 168
Clayton Walker v. Steve Barnett, et al
as 20-2870
Defendant / Appellee:
Steve Barnett, Secretary of State, in his official capacity, Marty Jackley, in his individual capacity, Shantel Krebs, in her individual capacity and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Clayton Walker
Matthew Tornquist v. Darin Young, et al
as 20-1888
Respondent / Appellee:
Darin Young and Marty Jackley, The Attorney General of the State of South Dakota
Petitioner / Appellant:
Matthew C. Tornquist
Steven Brende v. State of South Dakota, et al
as 20-1305
Petitioner / Appellant:
Steven Allen Brende
Respondent / Appellee:
Warden Darin Young, State of South Dakota, Governor Kristi Noem and others
Frank Ashley v. Darin Young, et al
as 19-2940
Respondent / Appellee:
Darin Young and Marty Jackley
Petitioner / Appellant:
Frank J. Ashley
Tornquist v. Young et al
as 5:2019cv05065
Respondent:
Darin Young and Marty Jackley
Petitioner:
Matthew C. Tornquist
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Brende v. State of South Dakota et al
as 4:2019cv04135
Respondent:
Governor Kristi Noem, Warden Darin Young, State of South Dakota and others
Petitioner:
Steven Allen Brende
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Roger Raymond v. Marty Jackley, et al
as 19-1057
Petitioner:
Roger Allen Raymond
Respondent:
Marty Jackley, Attorney General of South Dakota
Defendant / Appellee:
Darin Young, Warden, South Dakota State Penitentiary
Walker v. Panzer et al
as 4:2019cv04021
Plaintiff:
Clayton Walker and Clayton G. Walker
Defendant:
Marty Jackley, Dennis Kaemingh, Mike Liedholt and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
DuMarce v. Roberts County et al
as 1:2019cv01001
Defendant:
Marty Jackley, Roberts County, State of South Dakota and others
Plaintiff:
Marlon Troy DuMarce
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CAMPBELL v. FLUKE et al
as 5:2018cv05077
Respondent:
Darin Young, Dennis Daugaard, Brent Fluke and others
Petitioner:
KELLY JOE CAMPBELL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
