Cases 1 - 9 of 9
PHILLIPS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv00508
Defendant:
3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
MARVIN PHILLIPS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Russell v. Anderson et al
as 4:2011cv00529
Plaintiff:
Edward Lynn Russell, Chris Morrow, Marvin Phillips and others
Defendant:
Dee Anderson, Bob Knowles and John Ray
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Phillips et al v. Starcraft RV, Inc. et al
as 2:2009cv08241
Plaintiff:
Marvin Phillips, Marvin Phillips, Marvin Phillips and others
Defendant:
Starcraft RV, Inc., Bechtel Corporation, CH2M Hill, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Luis T Gonzalez v. Timothy L McCandless et al
as 2:2009cv06423
Plaintiff:
Luis T Gonzalez
Defendant:
Timothy L McCandless, Timothy L McCandless, Duane Lloyd and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Forma Pauperis Denial
Peters et al v. Gulf Stream Coach, Inc. et al
as 1:2009cv00602
Plaintiff:
Eddie L. Peters, All Plaintiffs, Izziah L. Peters and others
Defendant:
Gulf Stream Coach, Inc., Alliance Homes, Inc., American Camper Manufacturing, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
PHILLIPS et al v. GLAXOSMITHKLINE PLC
as 2:2007cv04982
Plaintiff:
MARVIN PHILLIPS, CAROLINE BLOCKER, DIANE SADDLER and others
Defendant:
GLAXOSMITHKLINE PLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Phillips et al v. GlaxoSmithKline PLC
as 1:2007cv02841
Plaintiff:
Marvin Phillips, Caroline Blocker, Diane Saddler and others
Defendant:
GlaxoSmithKline PLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
IN RE: FEE PAID - NO PAPERWORK
as 3:2007mc09004
Plaintiff:
Richard Keller, Robert C. Howard, Brian Douglas Hessel and others
Phillips v. Hust
as 04-36021
Plaintiff - Appellee:
FRANK MARVIN PHILLIPS
Defendant - Appellant:
LYNN HUST, Library Staff
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
