Cases 1 - 10 of 22
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-12474
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Scott II et al v. Collin County Texas et al
as 1:2023cv00101
Plaintiff:
MARVIN SCOTT II, LASANDRA SCOTT and Marvin Scott, II
Defendant:
COLLIN COUNTY TEXAS, SOUTHWEST CORRECTIONAL MEDICAL GROUP INC., WELLPATH LLC and others
Not Classified By Court:
James J Juneau
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Mayes v. Coyle et al
as 1:2023cv00011
Plaintiff:
Jamaal M. Mayes
Defendant:
Andrew Coyle, Corey Stokes, Kenneth Burnette and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mayes v. Coyle et al
as 3:2023cv00005
Plaintiff:
Jamaal M. Mayes
Defendant:
Andrew Coyle, Corey Stokes, Kenneth Burnette and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2022cv00777
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Scott v. Labat et al
as 1:2018cv02737
Plaintiff:
Marvin Scott
Defendant:
Patrick Labat and Reginald Gooden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1443
Palm Bay International, Inc. et al v. Winebow, Inc. et al
as 2:2018cv01094
Plaintiff:
Consorzio Cooperative Riunite D'Abruzzo, Palm Wine Holdings, LLC and Palm Bay International, Inc.
Defendant:
Marvin Scott Wines, Ltd., Winebow, Inc. and The Winebow Group, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Trademark
McKenzie v. Day et al
as 3:2017cv00468
Plaintiff:
James McKenzie
Defendant:
Jeff Day, Victor Cox, Randy York and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Denison v. Rush et al
as 2:2016cv00096
Plaintiff:
Jacqueline Denison
Defendant:
James Daniel Rush, Robert Heagerty, Thomas T. Little and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Scott v. Emanuel et al
as 1:2015cv08864
Plaintiff:
Marvin Scott
Defendant:
City Of Chicago
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
