Cases 11 - 20 of 32
Marie Arnold v. USA, et al
as 20-15277
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MARIE A. ARNOLD
Defendant:
ATTORNEY GENERAL, Department of Justice and UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington D.C.
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv08037
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551
Arnold v. Attorney General Department of Justice
as 5:2019cv05147
Plaintiff:
Marie Arnold and Marie A Arnold
Defendant:
Attorney General Department of Justice
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Arnold v. Metlife Auto & Home Insurance Agency, Inc. et al
as 5:2019cv03920
Plaintiff:
Marie Arnold and Marie A Arnold
Defendant:
Metlife Auto & Home Insurance Agency, Inc and MetLife Group, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Arnold v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 1:2019cv01974
Plaintiff:
Mary R. Arnold
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv02378
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329
Nautilus Insurance Company v. Alonso et al
as 2:2019cv00518
Defendant:
Mary Leigh Arnold, Tri-County Roofing Inc, Palmetto Pointe at Peas Island Condominium Property Owners Association Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Nautilus Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Arnold v. Hartford Life & Accident Insurance Company et al
as 1:2018cv11212
Plaintiff:
Mary Anne Arnold
Defendant:
Hartford Life & Accident Insurance Company and Hartford Financial Services Group
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2016cv01243
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2016cv00934
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
