Cases 21 - 30 of 106
Sasaki v. Inch et al
as 1:2018cv00270
Defendant:
David J. Bruce, Walter Williams, J. Ray Ormond and others
Plaintiff:
Terence Sasaki
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mitchell et al v. Mims et al
as 4:2018cv00515
Defendant:
Gary Mims, Hogan Transports, Inc. and Hogan Dedicated Services, LLC
Plaintiff:
Mitchell G Rick, Michelle N. Jackson, A. J. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Mary Ann Mitchell v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 5:2018cv01245
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff:
Mary Ann Mitchell
Stine v. Bureau of Prisons et al
as 1:2018cv01331
Plaintiff:
Mikeal Glenn Stine
Defendant:
Bureau of Prisons, Mary M. Mitchell, Sara Revell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Clervrain v. Mitchell
as 2:2018cv01716
Plaintiff:
Manetirony Clervrain
Defendant:
Mary M. Mitchell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stine v. Bureau of Prisons et al
as 2:2018cv00684
Plaintiff:
Mikeal Glenn Stine
Defendant:
Bureau of Prisons, Mary M. Mitchell, Sara Revell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Emiel Kandi v. Steve Langford, et al
as 18-55201
Plaintiff - Appellant:
EMIEL A. KANDI
Defendant - Appellee:
STEVE LANGFORD, Warden, Lompoc FCI, liable individually, in their official capacities, RAY GARCIA, Associate Warden, Lompoc, FCI, liable individually, in their official capacities, JOHN BRANNAN, Lompoc Mailroom Complex Supervisor, liable individually, in their official capacities and others
Lewis v. Grassley et al
as 3:2018cv00184
Defendant:
Ian Connors, Doctor Andrew Grassley, Doctor Jennifer Hunter and others
Plaintiff:
Julianna Marie Lewis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Tiedemann v. Mitchell et al
as 4:2017cv00597
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Daniel Tiedemann
Defendant:
Mary M Mitchell, JT Shartle and Rafael Zuniga
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Emiel A. Kandi v. Steven Langford et al
as 2:2017cv07650
Defendant:
James Binnebose, John Brannan, Ms Unknown Castillo and others
Plaintiff:
Emiel A. Kandi
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
