Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2019cv00647
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Moore et al v. Prudential Insurance Company of America et al
as 2:2013cv00156
Plaintiff:
William C Moore and Mary L Moore
Defendant:
Prudential Insurance Company of America and Unknown Parties
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Breach of Contract
Moore v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2012cv05048
Plaintiff:
Mary L. Moore
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc., Ethicon Women's Health and Urology, Gynecare and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv00031
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Trustee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1334
MOORE et al v. METROPOLITAN LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY et al
as 2:2010cv78928
Plaintiff:
WILLIS MOORE and MARY L. MOORE
Defendant:
METROPOLITAN LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY , TRANE US INC , BURNHAM CORPORATION and others
Cross_claimant:
ECKEL INDUSTRIES INC
Cross_defendant:
BAYER CROPSCIENCE INC , BIRD INC , BURNHAM CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MOORE et al v. METROPOLITAN LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY et al
as 2:2010cv00212
Plaintiff:
WILLIS MOORE and MARY L MOORE
Defendant:
METROPOLITAN LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, TRANE US INC, BURNHAM CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Baker v. Moore et al
as 8:2008cv01471
Plaintiff:
Steve Baker and Steve Baker
Defendant:
Enorris Moore, Mary L. Moore and Moore's Ironworks, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
MCBRIDE et al v. AMCHEM PRODUCTS, INC. et al
as 2:2007cv66324
Plaintiff:
TOMMY GENE MCBRIDE, BOYCE P. MCCLANE, BETTY MCCLAIN and others
Defendant:
A.P. GREEN SERVICES, INC., A.W. CHESTERTON COMPANY, AMCHEM PRODUCTS, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
