Cases 41 - 50 of 93
McGlynn v. Weinstein et al
as 1:2018cv07280
Defendant:
Judge Gregory Carro, Judge Robert A. Onofry, APA Karen Edelman-Feyes and others
Plaintiff:
Kevin McGlynn
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Abreu v. Dougherty et al
as 9:2018cv00828
Defendant:
L.T. Mr. Corey, Mr. Lighthall, Mr. LoRusso and others
Plaintiff:
Carlos Abreu
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 18-1078
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 18-874
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Banks v. Annucci et al
as 9:2018cv00319
Defendant:
Officer Royce, John Doe 11, 12, & 13, Champlain Valley Physicians' Hospital (CVPH) and others
Plaintiff:
Edwin B. Banks and Edwin Banks
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Banks v. Annucci et al
as 1:2017cv08188
Plaintiff:
Edwin B. Banks
Defendant:
Anthony Annucci, S. Racette, Tamer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dunn et al v. Johnson & Johnson et al
as 4:2017cv01846
Plaintiff:
Peggy Dunn , Theresa Archie , Delia Armendariz and others
Defendant:
Johnson & Johnson , Johnson & Johnson Consumer Compaines, Inc. and Imerys Talc America, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Sullivan v. Home Servicing, LLC et al
as 4:2017cv00358
Plaintiff:
Gail Marie Sullivan
Defendant:
Home Servicing, LLC and Majid Nataji
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Kotler v. Bosco et al
as 9:2017cv00394
Plaintiff:
Kerry Kotler
Defendant:
Maureen Bosco, Jeffery Nowicki, Emily Gray and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 17-257
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
