Cases 1 - 10 of 107
Mathis v. USA
as 4:2024cv00115
Petitioner:
Steven Thomas Mathis
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate/Correct Illegal Sentence
Mathis v. U S America
as 3:2024cv00012
Petitioner:
Bernard Mathis
Respondent:
U S America and MDOC Commissioner Burl Cain
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Mathis v. Lumpkin
as 23-40232
Petitioner / Appellant:
Jimmy Lee Mathis
Respondent / Appellee:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
Punch v. Marr et al
as 6:2022cv00031
Plaintiff:
Leroy Joseph Gilbert Punch
Defendant:
Sheriff Justin Marr, Cpt Williamson, Nurse Ullman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mathis v. Grimes County Jail
as 4:2022cv02608
Plaintiff:
Christy Allphin Mathis
Defendant:
Grimes County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mathis v. United States of America et al
as 3:2022cv00016
Petitioner:
Peter Mathis, Jr.
Respondent:
United States of America and M. Frink
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Wallace et al v. Mississippi Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2021cv00516
Plaintiff:
Eric Wallace, Fred Patmon, Timothy Robinson and others
Defendant:
Mississippi Department of Corrections, Nathan Burl Cain, Jeworski Mallett and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones v. O'Bryant et al
as 4:2021cv01403
Defendant:
Officer R. Coleman, Rocky Moore, J. Rodriguez and others
Plaintiff:
Kevin J. Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Alexander v. Moore et al
as 4:2020cv02724
Petitioner:
Ronald Lee Alexander, Sr.
Respondent:
Sharanda D. Mathis, Rocky Moore, Ashley Hastings and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Mathis v. Davis et al
as 4:2020cv02680
Defendant:
Warden Richerson, L. Davis, K. Mott and others
Plaintiff:
Ferlando Mathis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
