Cases 11 - 20 of 313
Mathis v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv01638
Plaintiff:
Debra A. Mathis
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Mathis et al v. American United Life Insurance Company
as 2:2023cv02243
Not Classified By Court:
Gina Gail Smith
Plaintiff:
Zach Mathis and Kristin Mathis
Defendant:
American United Life Insurance Company and The Presley-Taylor Group, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
Mathis et al v. American United Life Insurance Company
as 2:2023cv02242
Plaintiff:
Zach Mathis and Kristen Mathis
Defendant:
American United Life Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
Gregory MathisIn re: Gregory Mathis
as 23-5006
Petitioner:
In re: GREGORY LAMAR MATHIS
Respondent:
WARDEN JASON CLENDENION
Mathis v. Rose
as 7:2022cv00117
Petitioner:
Jay Gregory Mathis
Respondent:
Gary Rose
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv00444
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Mathis v. Joyner
as 7:2022cv00101
Petitioner:
Jay Gregory Mathis
Respondent:
Hector Joyner
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Mathis v. Woods et al
as 1:2022cv01180
Plaintiff:
Carlos D. Mathis
Defendant:
Unit Manager Woods, Unit Sgt. Mann, Lt. Gray and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Nalls v. Montgomery County Prosecutor's Office et al
as 3:2022cv00243
Plaintiff:
Larry Nalls
Defendant:
Montgomery County Prosecutor's Office, Mathis H. Heck, Lee C. Falke and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mathis v. Mohamed et al
as 2:2022cv11978
Plaintiff:
Selena Mathis
Defendant:
Abdirahim Mohamed and Iman Express LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
