Cases 1 - 10 of 22
Smith v. Thomson United States Penitentiary(F.B.O.P.) et al
as 3:2023cv50402
Plaintiff:
Matthew Michael Smith
Defendant:
Thomson United States Penitentiary(F.B.O.P.), Warden Gonzalis, G.E.O. Group and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Gonzalis et al
as 3:2023cv50226
Plaintiff:
Matthew Michael Smith
Defendant:
Gonzalis, Hess, GEO Group and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Norman v. Northwest Indiana (Section 8) et al
as 2:2021cv00350
Plaintiff:
laSandra Norman
Defendant:
Theresa L. Springmann, Diane P. Wood, William J. Bauer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Menard Correctional Center et al
as 3:2021cv00567
Defendant:
John/Jane Doe 1, John/Jane Doe 2 and Menard Correctional Center
Plaintiff:
Matthew J. Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Insurance Group USA
as 1:2019cv07906
Plaintiff:
Matthew A. Smith
Defendant:
Insurance Group USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
THE TORO COMPANY v. SMITH et al
as 1:2018cv03026
Defendant:
MATTHEW P. SMITH, MICHAEL D. FLOYD, R. SCOT JONES and others
Plaintiff:
THE TORO COMPANY
Smith v. Twaddell
as 3:2016cv03211
Plaintiff:
Matthew J Smith
Defendant:
William Twaddell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Illinois Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2016cv03119
Plaintiff:
Matthew J Smith
Defendant:
Illinois Department of Corrections, Pontiac Correctional Center, Randy Pfister and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Actavis, Inc. et al
as 1:2016cv02692
Plaintiff:
Matthew D. Smith
Defendant:
Actavis, Inc., Actavis Pharma, Inc., Actavis Laboratories UT, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1407
Matthew Smith v. Dale Scrogum, et al
as 15-2134
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MATTHEW J. SMITH
Defendant - Appellee:
DALE SCROGUM, Lieutenant, Pontiac Correctional Center, GREG KOCHEL, Correctional Officer, Pontiac Correctional Center and JODY DAVIS, Correctional Officer, Pontiac Correctional Center
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
