Cases 21 - 30 of 160
DAVIS v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv20043
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW DAVIS
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Davis v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv03431
Plaintiff:
Matthew Davis
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
GRAHAM v. CRISS et al
as 1:2022cv00253
Plaintiff:
MARK GRAHAM
Defendant:
CAROLYN CRISS, MATTHEW DAVIS, RODNEY BOUFFARD and others
Not Classified By Court:
MAINE ATTORNEY GENERAL - PRISONER CASES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DAVIES v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv21099
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW DAVIES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
DAVIS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv20579
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
BRIAN MATTHEW DAVIS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv02236
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
DAVIS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv13400
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW DAVIS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
THE HANOVER INSURANCE COMPANY v. DELAWARE VALLEY AUTOMATION, LLC et al
as 2:2021cv01525
Defendant:
ANDREW WARWICK, HOWARD WEITZNER, HARRY J. IRRGANG, JR. and others
Plaintiff:
THE HANOVER INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
United States of America v. Davis
as 21-716
Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Matthew Davis, AKA Sealed Defendant 1, AKA Matt
Alvarez v. Rockford Police Dept. et al
as 3:2021cv50127
Plaintiff:
Alonso Alvarez
Defendant:
Jason DoBran, Rockford Police Dept., Max Mart and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
