Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Miller v. C.R. Bard Inc et al
as 2:2023cv03323
Plaintiff:
Matthew J Miller
Defendant:
C.R. Bard Inc and Davol Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
MILLER v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
as 1:2022vv00190
Petitioner:
MATTHEW J. MILLER
Respondent:
SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 300 Vaccine Injury Act
Gardner v. State of Nebraska et al
as 8:2017cv00391
Plaintiff:
Justin Gardner
Defendant:
Douglas A. Johnson, Kimberly Pankonin Miller, Matthew J. Miller and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kevin Young, et al v. LG Chem LTD., et al
as 17-15857
Plaintiff - Appellee:
KEVIN YOUNG, BRADLEY SELDIN, BRUCE STERMAN and others
Objector - Appellant:
PATRICK S. SWEENEY
Defendant - Appellee:
LG CHEM LTD., LG CHEM AMERICA, INC., SONY CORPORATION and others
Kevin Young, et al v. LG Chem Ltd., et al
as 17-15795
Plaintiff - Appellee:
KEVIN YOUNG, BRADLEY SELDIN, BRUCE STERMAN and others
Kevin Young, et al v. LG Chem Ltd., et al
as 16-17235
Plaintiff - Appellee:
KEVIN YOUNG, BRADLEY SELDIN, BRUCE STERMAN and others
Objector - Appellant:
PATRICK S. SWEENEY
Defendant - Appellee:
LG CHEM LTD., LG CHEM AMERICA, INC., SONY CORPORATION and others
Miller v. White et al
as 1:2015cv00697
Plaintiff:
Matthew J. Miller
Defendant:
Heath White and Kent Ballard
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Miller v. White et al
as 1:2015cv00640
Defendant:
Heath White and Kent Ballard
Plaintiff:
Matthew J. Miller
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Miller et al v. LG Chem, Ltd. et al
as 4:2013cv00779
Plaintiff:
Matthew J. Miller and Rachel L. Miller
Defendant:
LG Chem Ltd., LG Chem America, Inc, Panasonic Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
IN RE: LITHIUM ION BATTERIES ANTITRUST LITIGATION
as 4:2013md02420
Plaintiff:
A-1 Computers Inc, Jason Ames, Automation Engineering, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 15 Antitrust Litigation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
