Cases 1 - 10 of 48
Kelly v. King
as 2:2024cv00581
Plaintiff:
Jessica Kelly
Defendant:
Matthew King
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
WARREN v. KING et al
as 1:2023cv00990
Plaintiff:
TINIKA SECAL WARREN
Defendant:
MATTHEW KING, HUD OFFICE GREENSBORO and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
KING v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv32828
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW KING
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
KING v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv25104
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW KING
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
KING v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2023cv20786
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW KING
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Daniels v. PennyMac Loan Services
as 23-20328
Plaintiff / Appellant:
David Lee Daniels, III
Defendant / Appellee:
PennyMac Loan Services, L.L.C., SWBC Mortgage Corporation, Citibank and others
KING v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv01658
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW KING
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
KING v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv01189
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW KING
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
King et al v. Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv02352
Plaintiff:
Nicole King and Matthew King
Defendant:
Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc., Teva Women's Health, LLC, Teva Branded Pharmaceutical Products R&D, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv01717
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
