Cases 1 - 10 of 43
Al Kau v. Timothy Lawrence Matthews, Jr. et al
as 8:2023cv02082
Plaintiff:
AL KAU
Petitioner:
DOOLEY MARSHALL
Defendant:
MATTHEWS LAWRENCE TIMOTHY, JR, Timothy Lawrence Matthews, Jr., Marshall W. Dooley and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
MOFFITT v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv00957
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW LAWRENCE MOFFITT
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
PETERSON v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2023cv21493
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW LAWRENCE PETERSON
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Horn v. Social Security Administration
as 6:2023cv00091
Plaintiff:
Matthew Lawrence Horn
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
LAWRENCE v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv03970
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW LAWRENCE and MATT LAWRENCE
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Webb v. City of Sacramento et al
as 2:2022cv01664
Plaintiff:
Solique Webb
Defendant:
City of Sacramento and Matthew Lawrence
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Castillo v. City of Lubbock, Texas et al
as 5:2022cv00212
Plaintiff:
Matthew Lawrence Castillo
Defendant:
City of Lubbock, Texas, Jhon Doe 1 5:22-CV-212 and Jhon Doe 2 5:22-CV-212
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
FRISVOLD v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv14216
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW LAWRENCE FRISVOLD
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
OTT v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv11720
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW LAWRENCE OTT and MATTHEW L OTT
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
LAWRENCE et al v. USA
as 1:2022cv00206
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW LAWRENCE and LURY IRENE BUDDE
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1491 Tucker Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
