Cases 21 - 30 of 40
Murray v. Atwood Oceanics, Inc.
as 1:2017cv00235
Plaintiff:
Matthew Murray
Defendant:
Atwood Oceanics, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
United States of America v. Nonjudicial Forfeiture Proceeding re: one 2012 Audi A6 Prestige, et. al et al
as 1:2017mc91222
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Nonjudicial Forfeiture Proceeding re: one 2012 Audi A6 Prestige, et. al
Claimant:
Matthew Murray
Katherine Murray et al v. GlaxoSmithKline LLC
as 1:2015cv13738
Plaintiff:
Katherine Murray and Matthew Murray
Defendant:
GlaxoSmithKline LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Katherine Murray et al v. GlaxoSmithKline LLC
as CAN/3:15-cv-04474
Plaintiff:
Katherine Murray , Matthew Murray and J M
Defendant:
GlaxoSmithKline LLC
Katherine Murray et al v. GlaxoSmithKline LLC
as 3:2015cv04474
Plaintiff:
Katherine Murray , Matthew Murray and J M
Defendant:
GlaxoSmithKline LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Teresa Alonzo et al v. City of Los Angeles et al
as 2:2014cv05636
Plaintiff:
Teresa Alonzo, Perry Alvarez, John Ammons and others
Defendant:
City of Los Angeles and Does
Howard et al v. Murray et al
as 2:2014cv01618
Plaintiff:
Tarrell Howard , Talya Medley and Ronald Medley
Defendant:
Matthew Murray, George Torres, Mark Lawler and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391
Medina v. Matthew's Lawn Service, Inc. et al
as 8:2014cv00104
Plaintiff:
Emilio Medina
Defendant:
Matthew's Lawn Service, Inc. and Matthew Murray
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Wee Care Child Center, Inc., et al v. Douglas Lumpkin, et al
as 10-4160
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WEE CARE CHILD CENTER, INC. and TONYA L. BROWN
Defendant - Appellee:
DOUGLAS E. LUMPKIN, IAN MCDOUGALL, DAN LANTZ and others
JOHNSON v. ZAGORI et al
as 2:2009cv04934
Plaintiff:
LOU E. JOHNSON
Defendant:
ANTHONY ZAGORI, LEO P. MCGUIRE, JOHN DOE #1, SHIFT COMMANDER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
