Cases 31 - 40 of 1,203
(SS) Hei v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2024cv00103
Plaintiff:
Matthew Hei
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Lucas v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv00275
Plaintiff:
Matthew Lucas
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Stone v. Commissioner Social Security Administration
as 6:2024cv00030
Plaintiff:
Matthew T. Stone
Defendant:
Commissioner Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1383 Review of HHS Decision
Troy Matthew Gleason v. Martin OMalley
as 5:2024cv00019
Plaintiff:
Troy Matthew Gleason and Martin J. O'Malley, Commissioner of Social Security
Defendant:
Martin OMalley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Kaplan v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2023cv01378
Plaintiff:
Matthew Scott Kaplan
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
SSA-Email Notification
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Mock v. Kijakazi
as 3:2023cv06586
Plaintiff:
JEFFREY MATTHEW MOCK
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security, Social Security Administration, Kilolo Kijakazi and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Lawrence v. O'Malley, Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2023cv00285
Plaintiff:
Matthew Thomas Lawrence
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security and Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1383 Review of HHS Decision
Reasin v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 6:2023cv06723
Plaintiff:
Matthew Kevin Reasin
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Evans v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 6:2023cv01590
Plaintiff:
Matthew S. Evans
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
